length vs girth

[wankmaster69]

this is to the ladies in particular, but guys can do it too. What do you think is more important in terms if cock size - length or girth? do you prefer a fat shorter one or a longer thinner one?

[Drumstick]

Lots of ppl would say longer, but that's a stereotype (spelled right ?)
I think fatter is better, cause of nerves stimulation and so on

[Zipgun]

I voted fatter. Because like they say about cars "Wider is better"

[txasbabe]

girth is nice, long is nice, shorts kinda nice also, oh hell as long as it's not the size of a pencil, it will work for me.

[BigBob]

Mmmm
*checks*

How about a magic marker?

[txasbabe]

nope has to be bigger than a magic marker

[smilingobserver]

I would say thick is the key, what good is a 12" dick if it's 2" around? But a shorter, thick one that fills ya up .....just feels so damn good.....



*lots o licks*

[txasbabe]

yeah, but if the guy knows he's little then he tries harder to make up for it. and he will be more skilled in other areas. If a guy knows he's packin then he doesnt think he has to try, he thinks just his dick is enough, and I want it all, kissing, touching, smelling, tasting, eating. wild hot passion.

[BigBob]

Yeah, but what about a guy who thinks he's small, makes up for it with massages, nipple biting, nipple licking, palming nipples (so I like nipples), long hot kisses and not just on the mouth, deep long massages (and not just the back and shoulders), thick tongue.......


Damn, this is getting hard to abstain.

[elisabeth]

*deleted*

[Susie]

Neither is important. It's the guy, his personality and his sense of humour that is far more attractive than a big cock.

[SavoryIce]

Neither is important. It's the guy, his personality and his sense of humour that is far more attractive than a big cock.

This is true. As far as size and thickness go, respectively, there isn't much of a difference among the average shapes and sizes of men when sexual stimulation is concerned. But, aside from sating the inherent yearning for sexual interaction, sex with a partner is something that's, well, more than a feeling, but more so a passion that perpetuates one's understanding of their partner's basest being; it's something that people share because they owe it to one another to become invigorated by both the physical and emotional aspects of the other. Thus, size isn't necessarily important, no matter which form of growth it favors. It's still a penis, a design of nature specifically made in mammals for having sex, and if it's worked so well the past several billion years, evidently, then it shouldn't matter now, which I personally don't think it does. We can provoke an infinite number of orgasms, but they're unfortunately very provisional evocations. Thus, the conjecture being that there's only one partner for each of us that we can respectively appreciate, why try to outsource an invaluable prospect with something so abundant that you've always had anyway?

Besides, size is just a facade of superiority; it's how you use what you have that yields satisfaction.

[lance.g]

As far as penis size goes, I think one's apprehension correlates with how they feel about most things. I am a natural worrier so I think my dick may be on the small side, though countless polls assure me it's average. I agree that in a relationship there are a variety of more important factors (such as sense of humour, communication, and so on); when I was married I don't remember penis size ever crossing my mind. I have also grown comfortable around women who don't know me well thanks to the 'it isn't the size but how you use it' maxim. I am now very confident in how I use it. I think the last stumbling block occurs when that safety net is removed. For example when I change before or after a hockey game, I am uncomfortable in a way I haven't been around women in more than a decade. I know that I will not get a chance to show the guys I'm sexually competent (and if I did receive that opportunity I really don't think I would be particularly interested). Hence, it's like a time warp back to high school when casual makeout sessions were interrupted with the nagging thought that she has been with tons of guys (not likely), all bigger than you (doubtful). So people don't worry, your dick is what it is; enjoy it, get comfortable with it, and most importantly work on your personality and partner satisfaction.
P.S. I am well aware that the real issue at work here is my insecurity as a hockey player; if I were better in that arena, I would no longer worry about shower room comparisons. However I have been trying to improve at sex and hockey for many years, and thus far the only substantial results have been in the bedroom.

[69loverx]

I have done measurements in the past. I came up (no pun intended....yet) with a length of 6.0-6.5" and 6" around. The 6" around was at the crown of the head..wides point. I might have cheated myself on the length, I read the proper way to do it is on the top with it nice and hard..........take the measuring tape and push into the fat pad on the top of your (or who ever's) dick so you get the longest length (I guess because you would be driving it in). I think my girth measurement was done properly, at the widest point. As I said, I will have to recheck length based on this info here, damn, I was 6.0-6.5" before, I can't lose size in this game.......damn, I wanna fuck or eat and be sucked (actually, don't care, I'll eat only for their pleasure, I'll do my dick by my own hand..
Please let me know if I am wrong on any of this stuff?

[elisabeth]

my reply was based on an appreciation of a specific individual rather than a generic comparison or critic.
no need for schematic when someone can drill the intensity into memory.