Uncircumsiced

[fredbird]

I am suprised to never see the topic of RECAP on here. That is the art of self restoral of foreskin. I have done it and stopped at about 75% coverage. It is great. Orgams are better now with a partner and by myself

[SAVANNAH]

For the life of me I can not imagine any reason why a man would choose to uncircumsize himself willingly.

I much prefer a man with a circumcised penis. I think they are more attractive to look at and are much superior from a hygene point of view than an uncircumsized one.

To be honest I have never had sexual relations with an uncircumsized man. If the truth were to be known I doubt seriously that I could tell the differance without first having seen whether it was "cut" or not.

[Baato]

in the end,

circumcised is just better hygiene.

the sex can be better uncircumcised. for men.
and circumcised better for Girls.

but it the end. it depends on your style and techniques

i believe a circumcised penis is less sensitive. A uncircumcised one has it's foreskin.
wile circumcised the head will always be in contact with something. underwear or so.
Uncircumcised the foreskin can stimulate the head of the penis.
but when rubbing in the vaginal canal. there is a bit less movement from the penis as the foreskin moves as well.
Circumcised will be less sensitive thus longer duration. better for the girl.


in the end it just depends on your style and techniques (as i already said)

[Jizzo]

Uncircumcised is better for jacking off.

[bugleone]

Interesting topic,...

Here in the UK boy babies are only circumcised for medical or religous reasons, so a large part of the male population are intact. I personally would NOT like or wish to be circumcised as the foreskin is a separate sexual substructure in it's own right with it's own distinct features, characteristics and function.

One of these functions is it's extreme and special sensitivity which is distinctly diferent to that of the glans itself. In my case, the foreskin is easily the most sesitive part of my penis and as such is a fundamental part of my sexual identity. The end of the foreskin, which hangs slightly off of the end of the penis when in the soft relaxed state like in those Greek statues in museums, is very sensitive on it's most outer edges as there is a ring of special nerve endings there. As the foreskin is pushed back on the erect penis, these nerve endings are stretched back onto the shaft of the penis and form another ring of sexual sensation which mirrors the edge of the glans but is quite different in feel. Thus, if the forskin is cut off as in the usual cicumcision done just to mutilate, then literally half of the penis' unique feeling must be lost. Uk surgeons (at least the indigenous ones) understand this as when babies have to be circumcised for medical reasons as much of the end edge of the foreskin as possible is retained unless the surgeon is an immigrant and there are now pressures to influence all surgeons regardless of culture origin, to comply.

For me, soft brushing of the outer edge of my foreskin is the quickest way to induce an erection and I greatly enjoy this as an important part of foreplay. Once I have a full erection, the foreskin, or hood, can be pushed gently back, preferably by gentle female fingers and stimulation of the glans can begin with light brushing back onto the stretched hood giving an alternative pleasure. Although it's difficult to describe, I would say that caresses to the glans are a deeply felt sensation, more important as arousal develops, while, stimulation of the stretched hood is a more surface sensation which is important during early arousal. Actual orgasm for me is triggered by stimulation of the stretched hood where it is flatly stretched under the glans. I cannot actually reach orgasm with just stimulation of the rim of the glans although I find this very exciting. From talking to women, I think that the glans is akin to the inside of the labia and the foreskin, particularly the tie, or frenum, is akin to the clitoris. I also enjoy stimulation of the shaft in much the same way as women like to have their vaginas filled once arousal is well on it's way, but cannot climax from this alone.

The real point about circumcision which has not been made here is that it is essentially a mutilation when carried out on very young babies for no reason other than the whim of parents or financial gains of doctors. if adults want to be circumcised that is their prerogative, but children should be protected in a humane society in my view.

Savannah,...I can understand that you dislike the look of the intact penis but as to the other matters in your post it might be better to broaden your experience so that you can make a more informed set of statements.

[SAVANNAH]

Well Mr bugleone as far as your concerned with broadening my experiences I will say only one thing.

Don't hold your breath till you have the occasion.

[jocelyn.secret]

Why are Americans obsessed with cutting off bits of mens bodies? Leave them alone or let them do it when old enough to choose. I have never been able to tell the difference when being fucked and uncut men offer more ways to please with my hands without the need for lube.

As for looks - cocks come in all shapes and sizes. Some sexy to look at, some wierd, some comical - enjoy diversity.

[bigdalten]

I am uncut and keep mine clean. I have never had anyone object to it, either from intercourse or from oral sex. As one person above said, it is easier to masturbate and its head is kept very sensitive. I need no lubrication to masturbate. Every woman who has experienced it has enjoyed it very much and the more experienced ones have indicated that the foreskin feels very good moving inside them. I know that having the extra skin makes it much thicker and more enjoyable to those who like thicker dicks.

[Susie]

Cut v. uncut? There has been lifelong debate over this.

Men with foreskins (in my experience) seems to think they have the monopoly on pleasure just because they have this ugly skin covering their penis head. They will all tell you that their penis is more sensitive, they have better orgasms, need no lubrication etc.etc.etc. What they don't mention is smegma....yuk.

Cut men will say their penis looks much more attractive, is easier to keep clean and has not been desensitised by being cut. Men who were circumcised as adults (my eldest son, for one) will tell you that they wish they had had it done years ago and makes no difference to sensitivity whatsoever.

The debate will continue. Everyone thinks that whatever they are, cut or uncut, is the best. Hey, what do I know? I haven't even got one but I know what I prefer.

[cearul]

I am currently restoring my foreskin. I've just purchased a TLC tugger to replace the cannister method I've been using.

[str8mate]

does that actually work? is it just painful with mediocre results?

[cearul]

I have been restoring on and off for almost a year (maybe 6 to 8 months of actual restoring) and I have had great success. In its flaccid state my penis is now covered by about a third. The TLC tugger should allow me more control over who my new foreskin is stretched and should lend to better results.

[str8mate]

and realizing that you can never restore the actual nerves that were lost in the process, will the "new" foreskin retain moisture like the original and thus act like you have an actual 4skin?

[ParaGoomba Slayer]

For the life of me I can not imagine any reason why a man would choose to uncircumsize himself willingly.

Becuase I was circumcised at birth without my consent. You wouldn't like it if part of you was cut off at birth without your consent.

Funny how our society frowns upon other societies cutting girls, and then we turn around and slice our own boys.

I much prefer a man with a circumcised penis. I think they are more attractive to look at and are much superior from a hygene point of view than an uncircumsized one.

1.) It's my penis, not yours. I don't care what you like better.

2.) Really, is it THAT hard to keep clean? I can't speak from experience (having being fucked out of the choice at birth), but pulling back a piece of skin for a few seconds under the shower stream does not seem difficult.

[cearul]

the new foreskin will retain moisture and function as if it were a real foreskin. The only difference is that it will not have as many nerve endings and will not have the same muscles as the original. As for looks and function it will look the same as the original, and will function the same. It will restore much of the sensitivity of the head of the penis even without the nerves that were cut away. You are correct that is will not be as good as a real foreskin, but for those of us who were circumcised at birth without a choice, it is the best we will get.